Centenial Celebration

Transaction Search Form: please type in any of the fields below.

Date: April 30, 2024 Tue

Time: 3:06 am

Results for terrorist detention

2 results found

Author: Constitution Project

Title: The Report of the Constitution Project's Task Force on Detainee Treatment

Summary: The Constitution Project's independent, bipartisan, blue-ribbon Task Force on Detainee Treatment examined the federal government's policies and actions related to the capture, detention and prosecution of suspected terrorists in U.S. custody during the Clinton, Bush and Obama administrations. Created late in 2010, the goal of the Task Force was to provide the American people with a broad understanding of what is known-and what may still be unknown-about the past and current treatment of suspected terrorists detained by the U.S. government. The Task Force identified detention policies and practices that will help America to better comply with the nation's legal obligations, foreign policy objectives and democratic values.

Details: Washington, DC: The Constitution Project, 2013. 560p.

Source: Internet Resource: Accessed October 30, 2014 at:http://detaineetaskforce.org/report/

Year: 2013

Country: United States

URL: http://detaineetaskforce.org/report/

Shelf Number: 133872

Keywords:
Detainees
Terrorism
Terrorist Detention
Terrorists (U.S.)

Author: Simcox, Robin

Title: The Presumption of Innocence: Difficulties in bringing Suspected Terrorists to Trial

Summary: The Presumption of Innocence, by Henry Jackson Society Research Fellow Robin Simcox, looks at the variety of reasons why the state has not always been able to try terror suspects. The main finding of the report is that, in an era of mass casualty terrorism, the notion that all such individuals can be tried in court is outdated The report demonstrates how prosecutions are just one aspect of a much broader strategy of stopping terrorism and not always necessary in order to prove the existence of a specific threat. The report goes on to call on Western governments - particularly those in Europe - to be clearer in explaining exactly why the state is forced to apply a broad series of measures in combating international terrorism. Partially based on field research undertaken at Guantanamo Bay, the report also argues that: - The majority of those detained at Guantanamo Bay will not be tried. Detention during a time of war takes place to prevent a perceived immediate threat; not as a prelude to trial for a criminal offence. - The operational counter-terrorism tactics of intelligence agencies and law enforcement can diverge significantly. Intelligence agencies' priority is disruption and prevention, not assembling information that can be used in court. - Prosecution of suspected terrorists is not always in the public interest. They risk disclosing classified information in court that hinders ongoing investigations, revealing sensitive sources, or exposing intelligence-gathering methods. - As al Qaeda often operates in ungoverned mountainous regions, the U.S. and its allies have limited access to capturing fighters based there. This has led to the increased use of armed drones and targeted killing, a tactic that will continue in the future.

Details: London: The Henry Jackson Society, 2013. 41p.

Source: Internet Resource: Accessed February 11, 2016 at: http://henryjacksonsociety.org/

Year: 2013

Country: International

URL: http://henryjacksonsociety.org/

Shelf Number: 137846

Keywords:
Islam
Prosecution
Terrorism
Terrorist Detention
Terrorists